Critically Assess Dawkins Claim That Since Life Is No More Than DNA Reproducing Itself There Can Be No Life After Death

Topics: Afterlife, Death, Life Pages: 5 (2679 words) Published: April 27, 2015
Critically assess Dawkins claim that since life is no more than DNA reproducing itself there can be no life after death. “People believe things they have been told to”. Dawkins claimed that it is unrealistic to suggest there is a life after death without any empirical evidence; people have created this false analogy that there is something more out there without much evidence. Seeing as there is no God and no one has seen him clearly suggested to Dawkins that there isn’t one and the religious ideas surrounding life after death are falsifiable. To him the afterlife was that of a “delusion of the next world”. Dawkins was a very intelligent man and to him belief in the afterlife was illogical and implausible. He claimed life was no more than DNA reproducing itself. Are his claims surrounding life after death not realistic when we take empirical evidence in to account? In his famous bestselling book (River out of Eden) the famous scientist Richard Dawkins explained why he believed as he did that life is no more than DNA and why the thought of an afterlife is unrealistic. He spoke of the soul and held a strong opinion believing we are genes and there is not really any need for a soul. Similarly we are here to carry genes, digital information and so DNA. “Life is just bytes and bytes of digital information”. The River out of Eden could be called the River of DNA and genes. It is here where Dawkins suggests our genes/DNA have kept flowing through the river causing us to survive. He claims we inherit our genes from successful people i.e. our ancestors who survived long enough to pass on the gene/digital information. Many rivers have come to an end and those who were part of that river have become extinct. This is where his theory relates to survival of the fittest, where the strongest who have the strongest genes survive whilst the weaker become extinct and there river comes to an end. The river itself is a digital river. Genes themselves are pure digital information which can be encoded, recorded or decoded and without genes we would not exist. As to him every cell in our body contains the equivalent of forty six immense data types. Each cell has a different purpose; he suggested this is why muscle cells are different to liver cells. Dawkins suggested humans are “Robot vehicles blindly programmed to be selfish”. He felt no need to believe in any religion as he said ‘x’ may be comforting but just because it is comforting doesn’t necessarily make it true. He believed that there is something within humans that makes them feel the need for something, something to comfort them and act as a security blanket. Dawkins claimed those who believe in God and heaven believe this for their own security. Dawkins point of view sits well with those that believe God is merely an idea that has been created by people that want to believe there is something more out there. To Dawkins, belief in God is fiction. Therefore people who are atheists will find his theory beneficial and therefore agree with it. His theory is logical as it relies on science and scientific research that has benefitted civilisation in the past therefore there has to be truth to what Dawkins has put forward. It seems logical to agree with what Dawkins has suggested as it has scientifically been proven that cells do differ, this relates to his work on liver and muscle cells. His work is based on science and science isn’t likely to be wrong. Some may find his theory slightly robotic as humans are more than just DNA. He says we are “bytes and bytes of DNA”, are we not more than just genetic makeup? Dawkins theory doesn’t explain why humans are emotional. To him emotions would be inefficient as they cloud our genetic processes and are in fact pointless. . “Robot vehicles blindly programmed to be selfish”, his theory is very negative and sees humans as being that care for themselves and less for others. This isn’t the case for all making his theory weaker. As humans are so...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Life After Death essay
  • Life After Death Essay
  • Life after death Essay
  • life after death Essay
  • Essay about Life After Death
  • Essay about Life After Death
  • life after death Essay
  • Theology Life After Death Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free